The Brighton Forest board has started fining our family and threatening foreclosure over the solar panels on our roof, and now we're suing to keep our home. Our neighbors can help. The problem is the ARC guidelines. They're vague in ways that allow for misinterpretation and don't align with North Carolina law. What we're proposing settles a lot of concerns neighbors brought to us after we shared our story.
Read our story →And help improve your neighborhood.
What started as a fight to keep our home has become a chance to fix what isn't working for many of us.
We want to thank you all for the outpouring of support we received after sharing our story about suing the HOA. It has meant more to us than you could imagine.
We've spent a lot of time since then thinking about how to turn that support into something actionable that improves the experience of living in Brighton Forest for the whole community, and not just our household.
What we heard is a theme across many of the responses: a lack of consistency in the assessment and application of our covenants and guidelines, and a lack of transparency and accountability overseeing board operations and conduct.
BF is a highly sought-out neighborhood for many reasons. Front-facing solar panels is not one of them and is probably a minus on that list. I, personally, have no interest in solar, and I have no interest in looking at a neighbor's solar panels on the front of their house.
While this is a perfectly valid opinion, consider an individual on the board willing to deny your legal rights because they personally dislike solar panels. Under North Carolina law, an HOA can't use general aesthetic objections to override a homeowner's right to install solar. But that doesn't stop an unaccountable board from trying when anything they find unappealing becomes fair game.
Vague language doesn't help homeowners. It only helps a board or committee member who wants to impose their personal preferences on everyone else. That's why we want to update the guidelines so homeowners have clear guidance, and so no one on the board can bend the rules or the law to suit themselves.
The current ARC guidelines lean on hedging phrases like whenever possible and as inconspicuously as possible, leaving every decision to the reviewer's reading of the day. Two neighbors with the same project can get two different answers. That isn't anyone's fault. It's the language. Here's the kind of change we're proposing.
If you'd like clear rules, transparency, and accountability from your HOA, add your name and we'll keep you posted.